The Nigerian Bar Association has cautioned legal practitioners against filing cases that seek to involve the courts in internal disputes within political parties, warning that such actions could attract disciplinary measures.
In a statement issued amid the ongoing leadership crisis within the African Democratic Congress, the association expressed concern over what it described as a rising pattern of lawyers and courts being drawn into intra-party conflicts, despite clear legal restrictions.
According to the NBA, recent political and legal developments ahead of the 2027 general elections—particularly those linked to the interpretation of the Electoral Act 2026—pose serious concerns for constitutional governance, democracy, and the rule of law.
The association emphasised that the law expressly prohibits courts from handling matters related to the internal affairs of political parties. Citing Section 83 of the Electoral Act, it reiterated that courts lack jurisdiction over such cases and are equally barred from issuing interim or interlocutory orders in such disputes.
It criticised what it sees as ongoing violations, noting that some lawyers continue to file such cases, while certain courts have reportedly granted injunctions contrary to statutory provisions. The NBA warned that this trend could weaken democratic institutions and processes.
Describing the practice as an abuse of the judicial system, the association said such litigation often involves forum shopping and is driven by attempts to gain undue political advantage. It stressed that lawyers must uphold their professional duty as officers of the court rather than act as agents of partisan interests.
The NBA further stated that it would not hesitate to initiate disciplinary proceedings against any lawyer found to be engaging in such conduct, including referring cases to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee. It maintained that this step is necessary to protect the integrity of the legal profession and the judicial process.
The association also urged the judiciary to remain cautious and avoid being entangled in politically motivated disputes, stressing the need to preserve the independence and credibility of the courts.