Can Engaging in Sexual Activity 21 Times Monthly Prevent Prostate Problems

Can Engaging in Sexual Activity 21 Times Monthly Prevent Prostate Problems: Prostate-related ailments, unique to men due to their distinct reproductive system, encompass inflammation, an enlarged prostate

, and prostate cancer. A recent viral video suggested a threshold of 21 monthly sexual activities to stave off prostate issues,

sparking widespread debate. Investigative efforts ensued to authenticate this claim.

Verification efforts led to a Urology Care Foundation study involving 32,000 men, which suggested a 20% lower prostate cancer

risk for those ejaculating 21 times a month compared to those with lower frequency. However, ejaculation’s impact on prostate cancer

remains uncertain, as it may not be the sole mitigating factor.

Can Engaging in Sexual Activity 21 Times Monthly Prevent Prostate Problems: The Research

Multiple studies have examined ejaculation frequency’s relationship with prostate health, yielding conflicting results. While some suggest a protective effect, others indicate potential risks, depending on age and other variables. Despite varied findings, moderation appears prudent.

Understanding prostate cancer risk factors is essential beyond ejaculation rates and age. Age, race, and geographical location also influence

susceptibility, with older age and African American ethnicity posing higher risks. Geographic variations further complicate risk assessment,

warranting comprehensive awareness of prostate cancer determinants.

Other common factors encompass family history and genetic changes, such as alterations in the BRCA genes, which elevate the risk of breast

and ovarian cancers. Additionally, exposure to certain chemicals, including Agent Orange used during the Vietnam War, may have potential links to prostate cancer.

Expert Perspectives

Jeremiah Agim, a gynecologist, offered insights while highlighting various causes of prostate issues beyond ejaculation. He emphasized that

addressing ejaculation alone may not significantly alter outcomes, citing numerous risk factors for prostate cancer, ranging from age and genetics to

lifestyle choices and environmental exposures.

Agim also challenged the claimant’s physiological theory regarding prostate function, suggesting that the notion of use and disuse does not align

with the dynamics of prostate health. He emphasized the importance of ejaculation in removing potential carcinogens but cautioned against oversimplifying

complex physiological processes.

Olurotimi Ogundunniyi, Head of the Surgery Department at UNIMED Ondo State, dismissed the assertion as opinion rather than scientific fact,

emphasizing the need for evidence-based conclusions. Similarly, Emmanuel Adugba, a urologist at Rock Creek Care Hospital Abuja, cautioned against

sensationalizing the link between sex and prostate cancer, stressing the importance of evidence over sentiment.

Verdict: Misleading

Available research presents conflicting findings, necessitating further investigation. Experts caution against accepting the claim as established scientific

fact, highlighting ongoing research in the field.

Conclusion
While some studies suggest potential benefits of frequent ejaculation, the connection to prostate cancer remains inconclusive. More research is

warranted to elucidate this relationship, and experts emphasize the importance of evidence-based conclusions in addressing complex health issues.